In Dan Haren, We See What Ben Sheets Could Have Been | Disciples of Uecker

Disciples of Uecker

We'd like to go to the Playoffs, that would be cool.

From 2002 to 2007, Ben Sheets was the Milwaukee Brewers.

At least, that’s the way it was in my mind. There were guys like Richie Sexson (who I loved) and Geoff Jenkins. Bill Hall was fun for a while. Starting in 2005, the young talent that forms the current nucleus of the Brewers started flowing in as well. But the only player who qualified as truly elite — or had the potential to do so — was Sheets. When he was healthy, he was one of the best pitchers the Brewers had ever seen and one of the very best pitchers in baseball. His peak years ran from 2002 through 2008, his age 24 through 29 seasons. Over those six years, Sheets ran a 4.83 strikeout-to-walk ratio. Among pitchers who started at least 60% of their games at ages 24 through 29, only Pedro Martinez (5.16) is higher.

When we increase the innings threshold to 800 — limiting our search to guys that were full time starters at some point — we get a top five including Johan Santana (4.35), Dan Haren (4.13) and Fergie Jenkins (3.94). The similarities between Haren’s peak years — his last seven, dating back to 2005 — and Sheets’s are remarkable.

Source: FanGraphsBen Sheets, Dan Haren

Source: FanGraphsBen Sheets, Dan Haren

Neither of the two spent their peaks considered as one of baseball’s elite by the general public. When their teams competed, they were typically overshadowed by another ace (CC Sabathia for Sheets, Brandon Webb or Jered Weaver for Haren). But Haren has stayed healthy into his 30s — he enters his age 31 season this year with seven consecutive 200-inning seasons to his name, a feat Sheets never achieved after doing so for a third and final time in 2004.

The “what could have been?” with Ben Sheets will be the question that will stick with me from my childhood baseball viewing experience. Dan Haren isn’t the same pitcher by any means — he doesn’t sport the same 12-to-6 curveball and operates with a bit of a different flair from Sheets — but I like to think his success is similar to what Sheets would have been capable of with good health.

Share Our Posts

Share this post through social bookmarks.

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Newsvine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati


Tell us what do you think.

  1. Tom S. says: March 14, 2012

    Nice article, Jack. It is interesting to think what could have been, especially in impact of the 2009-2010 seasons. If Sheets hadn’t faced so many injury issues, the Brewers might have made a greater attempt to re-sign him, and in turn may have gotten more out of what seemed like a wasted 2009. That’s a lot of “what if” though.

    The unfortunate fact is that Dan Haren is Dan Haren today because he could stay healthy, where as Ben Sheets will always be a question mark as to what he truly could have accomplished despite solid returns in the limited time he saw.


Websites mentioned my entry.

There are no trackbacks on this entry

Add a Comment

Fill in the form and submit.